Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Without Nature?A New Condition for Theology$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David Albertson and Cabell King

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9780823230693

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: March 2011

DOI: 10.5422/fso/9780823230693.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2021. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use.date: 01 August 2021

Nature as Given, Nature as Guide, Nature as Natural Kinds: Return to Nature in the Ethics of Human Biotechnology

Nature as Given, Nature as Guide, Nature as Natural Kinds: Return to Nature in the Ethics of Human Biotechnology

Chapter:
(p.152) Nature as Given, Nature as Guide, Nature as Natural Kinds: Return to Nature in the Ethics of Human Biotechnology
Source:
Without Nature?
Author(s):

Gerald McKenny

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fso/9780823230693.003.0008

This chapter addresses the question of nature as normative. Drawing on the writings of Michael Sandel, Leon Kass, and Francis Fukuyama, members of President George W. Bush's Council on Bioethics, it proposes three ways that nature is given normative status in contemporary discussions of bioengineering. Sandel, Kass, and Fukuyama all set out in the hope that a conception of the normative significance of nature will set limits and give direction to recent and emerging uses of biotechnology where the moral and political order of liberal society, with its narrow focus on autonomy and justice (Sandel), its exaggerated humanitarianism (Kass), and its failure to secure its own grounds (Fukuyama), has failed. In each case, the appeal to nature identifies certain goods that are threatened by the contemporary version of the Cartesian program: kinds of worth that resist our will to mastery (Sandel), aspects of embodied life that are the source of human meaning (Kass), and commitments to equality of worth (Fukuyama). In each case, though, the claim to establish nature as a norm was not sustainable, though for different reasons. We are left in the uncomfortable position of recognizing that to be entirely without nature in any of these three senses would leave us morally impoverished while acknowledging that we are unable to draw clear lines that would indicate the point at which our moral impoverishment would occur.

Keywords:   nature, normativity, Michael Sandel, Leon Kass, Francis Fukuyama, bioengineering

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .