Anti-aestheticism, Leftist Solutions, and the Commodification of the Multitude
Through a reading of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's Empire, this chapter examines a series of political-theoretical discourses that continue to serve up the idea of deconstruction's “apoliticality”. It investigates not only their claim on the political but also the fact that they make this claim through a dismissal of deconstruction. It asks whether anti-deconstruction is central or peripheral to these assertions about the political. Hardt and Negri imply the division of the politics of identity from the politics of “the multitude”. Yet, the discussion of aestheticism suggests that this partition between identity politics and multitude is impossible to draw. Hardt and Negri insist that the difference between Left and Right, multitude and empire, is not given by empire itself. Instead, they demonstrate how the former is not conceivable without the emergence of the latter.
Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.