Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Plato and the Invention of Life$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Michael Naas

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780823279678

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: September 2018

DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823279678.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use.date: 23 October 2019

Life and Spontaneity

Life and Spontaneity

Chapter:
(p.42) Chapter 2 Life and Spontaneity
Source:
Plato and the Invention of Life
Author(s):

Michael Naas

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fordham/9780823279678.003.0003

Chapter 2 focuses on the myth of the two ages and the pivotal role played by the adjective automatos in the Stranger’s telling of that myth (267c–274d). It is argued that Plato’s use of the term automatos to describe both the way in which the fruits of earth come up “of their own accord,” “freely,” or “spontaneously” during the Age of Kronos and the way the universe or cosmos, itself a living being, moves during the Age of Zeus, reveals a tension at the very heart of Plato’s conception of life. By comparing Plato’s use of this term automatos in the Statesman to other uses in the dialogues (in Theaetetus, Sophist, Protagoras, and elsewhere), it is shown that automatos must be understood as something like—to use Derrida’s vocabulary—an undecidable, akin to the pharmakon of Phaedrus, that is, a fundamentally ambivalent notion around which a whole series of opposing terms (activity/passivity, inside/outside, natural movement/mechanical causality) revolves. The chapter concludes by suggesting that this use of automatos, in conjunction with a somewhat unexpected use of the term mimesis in the same myth, might indicate an unacknowledged Heraclitean influence on the Statesman and might help explain Plato’s multiple references to Heraclitus in related dialogues (such as Sophist, Theaetetus, and Cratylus). This allows us then to ask whether a (perhaps Heraclitean) notion of mimesis—another way of describing what is called here Plato’s political anamnesis—is not what links the Age of Zeus to the Age of Kronos, and, perhaps, human life in the Age of Zeus to the life itself in the Age of Kronos.

Keywords:   automatos, Jacques Derrida, Heraclitus, mimesis, Plato, spontaneity, Statesman

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .