Incompossibility, Being-in-Common, Abandonment, and the Auto-Reject
The conclusion resituates the question of the reject in terms of what Nancy calls “being-in-common.” According to Nancy, “being-in-common” concerns the way every existent in the world coexists with other existents, which includes how some existents are embraced while others are rejected. Recognizing that some existents are not accepted does not mean their total abandonment from the concept of “being-in-common,” however. On the contrary, “being-in-common” seeks to articulate how these rejects continue to exist alongside others. One can also put this in terms of Deleuze’s reiteration of Leibniz’s “incompossibility,” which is to say, the search for a new harmony composed of dissonant elements or those that are typically considered not to add up to an existing whole. There is no abandonment here, in contrast to global capital’s “economies of abandonment,” which render inoperative alternative economic systems. The only abandonment in this “incompossibility” is perhaps the renunciation of all pre-existing and future conditions or predicates for this new harmony. In that respect, the auto-reject, which refuses all hypostasis upon a particular thought or disposition, is possibly an ideal conceptual figure to advance the thought of this new harmony.
Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.