Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Marginal ModernityThe Aesthetics of Dependency from Kierkegaard to Joyce$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Leonardo Lisi

Print publication date: 2012

Print ISBN-13: 9780823245321

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: May 2013

DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823245321.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2022. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use.date: 28 June 2022

Presuppositions and Varieties of Aesthetic Experience

Presuppositions and Varieties of Aesthetic Experience

Chapter:
(p.22) (p.23) CHAPTER ONE Presuppositions and Varieties of Aesthetic Experience
Source:
Marginal Modernity
Author(s):

Leonardo F. Lisi

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fordham/9780823245321.003.0003

Chapter 1 explores the philosophical origins of the three aesthetic paradigms at the heart of this book: the aesthetics of fragmentation, the aesthetics of autonomy, and the aesthetics of dependency. Common to all three is their indebtedness to the problems left unresolved by Kant's philosophy. This legacy gives rise to two dominant reactions in the late eighteenth century. The first is the neo-skeptical position that rejects Kant's project, while the second comes from the idealist thinkers who strive to complete Kant's system by arguing that the apparent contradictions of existence in fact are grounded in an underlying unity. The former provides the foundations for the avant-gardes and the latter for the aesthetics of autonomy. The chapter then turns to Kierkegaard and derives a third aesthetic model from his theology, one which falls between the previous two alternatives. This “aesthetics of dependency” provides a mediation of contradiction without unification by formulating the principle according to which the work must be organized in terms incompatible with that work's own representational and thematic structures. The purposeful relation of the work's parts is in this way made to depend on an interpretative perspective not coextensive with the logic of those parts themselves.

Keywords:   Immanuel Kant, Scepticism, Autonomy, Avant-gardes, Søren Kierkegaard, Aesthetics, Theology and Literature, Mediation

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .