Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
EcospiritReligions and Philosophies for the Earth$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Laurel Kearns and Catherine Keller

Print publication date: 2007

Print ISBN-13: 9780823227457

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: March 2011

DOI: 10.5422/fso/9780823227457.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use (for details see http://www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 23 November 2017

Talking the Walk: A Practice-Based Environmental Ethic as Grounds for Hope

Talking the Walk: A Practice-Based Environmental Ethic as Grounds for Hope

Chapter:
(p.45) Talking the Walk: A Practice-Based Environmental Ethic as Grounds for Hope
Source:
Ecospirit
Author(s):

Anna L. Peterson

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fso/9780823227457.003.0003

There is strong evidence in favor of two apparently contradictory truths. First, most people want a clean and safe environment, with abundant habitat for nonhuman species and wild places in addition to livable human settlements. Second, this valuation of the natural world is not always, and maybe not usually, reflected in people's personal consumption practices or political choices. There seems to be, in other words, little if any causal relationship between environmental value orientations, awareness, and concern, on the one hand, and behavior, on the other. This chapter explores these questions, from the perspective of a social ethicist interested in the ways that values translate into action and as an environmentalist concerned with the gap between our theories (our “talk”) and our practices (our “walk”). The challenge of understanding and addressing the gap between ideas and action requires the contributions of ecological theologians and ethicists, just as it challenges them to reflect and act differently. While the gap will probably never be closed entirely, it must be acknowledged that today the divide between the value we say we place on nonhuman nature and the way we act threatens the survival of nonhuman and human worlds alike.

Keywords:   nature, environmental ethics, environmental practice, environmental philosophy, ecological theology

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .