Completions of Immanence
This chapter presents an attempt to follow the idea that “immanence is complete.” In writing Derrida and Husserl: The Basic Problem of Phenomenology the author was guided by this particular Hyppolitian idea. However, Derrida and Husserl did not consider the relation of Derrida's thought to that of Hegel. As the title indicates, it considered the relation of Derrida's thought to Husserl's phenomenology. Husserlian phenomenology, like that of Hegel (and Hyppolite was aware of this), is one way of completing immanence, and therefore it overcomes Platonism: the primary implication of completing immanence. But perhaps there are other ways to complete immanence and thus other implications beyond the overcoming of Platonism. Derrida is a phenomenologist, but he is also something else.
Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.