Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Medieval Exegesis and Religious DifferenceCommentary, Conflict, and Community in the Premodern Mediterranean$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ryan Szpiech

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780823264629

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: January 2016

DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823264629.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use (for details see http://www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 12 December 2017

Reconstructing Thirteenth-Century Jewish–Christian Polemic

Reconstructing Thirteenth-Century Jewish–Christian Polemic

From Paris 1240 to Barcelona 1263 and Back Again

Chapter:
(p.115) 7 Reconstructing Thirteenth-Century Jewish–Christian Polemic
Source:
Medieval Exegesis and Religious Difference
Author(s):

Harvey J. Hames

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fordham/9780823264629.003.0007

This chapter considers the historiography of Dominican engagement with the Talmud and other postbiblical Hebrew sources while also going on to consider Jewish-Christian polemical arguments more generally. The author sees Nahmanides’s Hebrew account of the 1263 debate as a starting point for discussing similar documents from other thirteenth-century Jewish-Christian disputations and conflicts, above all the “Talmud Trial” of the 1240s that took place in Paris after charges of blasphemy were brought against the Talmud by the converted Jew and Dominican Nicholas Donin. He compares the Hebrew account of the events in the 1240s (written, in the opinion of most scholars, soon afterwards by Joseph ben Nathan Official, author of the Hebrew Sefer Yosef ha-meqanneʾ, or Book of Joseph the Zealot), with Nahmanides’s account of the Barcelona Disputation and with an anonymous Hebrew account of Pablo’s later harangue to the Jews of Paris in the early 1270s. By noting the parallels between the various Hebrew accounts, he suggests that the account of Joseph ben Nathan Official was actually written much later and modeled on the texts from Paris and Barcelona.

Keywords:   Disputation of Barcelona, Nicholas Donin, Joseph ben Nathan Official, Sefer Yosef ha-meqanneʾ, Nahmanides, Christian attacks on Talmud, Pau Crestià (Pablo Cristiani)

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .