Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Vladimir JankélévitchThe Time of Forgiveness$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Aaron T. Looney

Print publication date: 2015

Print ISBN-13: 9780823262960

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: September 2015

DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823262960.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use (for details see http://www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 11 December 2017

Repentance

Repentance

Concerning Unconditionality

Chapter:
(p.208) 7 Repentance
Source:
Vladimir Jankélévitch
Author(s):

Aaron T. Looney

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fordham/9780823262960.003.0008

This chapter inquires into whether there is a pre-condition for the inexcusable, namely teshuvah, metanoia, or repentance. For Jankélévitch, nothing is impossible for forgiveness, yet he adheres to the moral and juridical insistence on the necessity of repentance for the efficaciousness of forgiveness. This chapter contrasts his views with Derrida's emphasis on the unconditional character of forgiveness and shows that this interpretative discrepancy mirrors the ambivalence of the Abrahamitic traditions. A rereading of Lévinas’s Talmud readings underscores the competing logics of unconditionality and conditionality inherent in these religions. This chapter approaches the philosophical problem of repentance historically and systemically, reviewing the positions on repentance by Plato, the Stoics, Kierkegaard, Scheler, and Sartre. Repentance, it demonstrates, revolves around the question of self-transformation and with it, identity and integrity. In this context, the chapter addresses the relations of repentance to guilt, atonement, suffering, and punishment, which provide the background for evaluating Jankélévitch’s phenomenological distinctions between repentance, regret, and remorse.

Keywords:   Atonement, Guilt, Identity, Kierkegaard, Levinas, Metanoia, Regret, Remorse, Scheler, Teshuvah

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .