Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Creolizing Political TheoryReading Rousseau through Fanon$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jane Anna Gordon

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780823254811

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823254811.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use (for details see http://www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 24 November 2017

Introduction

Introduction

Chapter:
(p.1) Introduction
Source:
Creolizing Political Theory
Author(s):

Jane Anna Gordon

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fordham/9780823254811.003.0001

The introduction defines the concepts of “creolization” and “creolizing” and what it means to have a creolized or creolizing approach to politics, political theory, and political science. This involves distinguishing creolization from other ways of understanding the relations among meaningful, politically salient forms of difference. In particular, creolization is differentiated from multiculturalism, hybridity, and decreolization and from the respective disciplinary counterparts of each. This is because ways of conceiving of “culture” overdetermine how scholars understand the nature and significance of the academic disciplines of which they are part. It advances the reading of Rousseau and Fanon in a way that breaks with comparative political theory since the focus is not on the contributions of each to their distinctive political and social worlds but to understandings of questions of method and political legitimacy more generally. Finally, this section introduces the idea of creolization as the progressive generalizing of political will through which syntheses that better approximate the needs and hopes of the society at large can emerge. While creolization does not have a necessary relationship to colonized peoples, it is likely to be opposed by those who benefit from claiming that existing arrangements are as representative as is possible.

Keywords:   Rousseau, Fanon, democratic legitimacy, methodology, creolization, political theory, colonized peoples, multiculturalism, hybridity, decreolization

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .