Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Imperative to WriteDestitutions of the Sublime in Kafka, Blanchot and Beckett$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jeff Fort

Print publication date: 2014

Print ISBN-13: 9780823254699

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: September 2014

DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823254699.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use (for details see http://www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 November 2017

Beckett’s Voices and the Paradox of Expression

Beckett’s Voices and the Paradox of Expression

Chapter:
(p.293) Chapter 8 Beckett’s Voices and the Paradox of Expression
Source:
The Imperative to Write
Author(s):

Jeff Fort

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fordham/9780823254699.003.0009

This chapter analyzes a fundamental paradox that cuts across Beckett’s corpus, in which the impossibility of expression is doubled by the equally insistent inevitability of expression. Both sides of this paradox are laid out in reference to texts in which the first person voice, while progressively attenuated and stripped of every narrative resource, nonetheless continues to speak in a language from which it cannot eliminate a singular past, its own having been. In readings of Beckett’s postwar novels (Mercier and Camier, Molloy, Malone Dies and The Unnamable), against the background of the manifesto type statements in “Three Dialogues with Georges Duthuit,” it is shown that the obtrusive insistence of this singular past constitutes its own pointed but empty imperative to speak, one that continually shades into sheer compulsion. The lyricism of these texts reveals a stubborn melancholy attachment to past time, indeed a deep sentimentality, that is undermined, but not dissolved, by Beckett’s irony, and by formal procedures such as the use of pronouns (as discussed by Emile Benveniste). The narrative voice, in its lyricism and derision, is the tortured locus of these incompatible but ineliminable structural tendencies.

Keywords:   Samuel Beckett, Three Dialogues with Georges Duthuit, Mercier and Camier, Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable, lyricism, sentimentality, Emile Benveniste, pronouns

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .