Analyzing public debates on the atrocities committed in Abu Ghraib Prison on the one hand and those committed in Iran’s Kahrizak Prison on the other, this chapter argues that in the Iranian case, facts are buried under an absence of evidence, while in the United States facts relating to the atrocities in Abu Ghriab are overexposed. Yet the end result of both processes--underexposure of Kahrizak and overexposure of Abu Ghraib -- is the same: a damnation of memory, a removal from remembrance. The difference in the two processes highlights two diametrically opposed visual regimes that the chapter explores in relation to Iranian and Hollywood film cultures and U.S.-European film studies.
Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.