Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Castoriadis's OntologyBeing and Creation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Suzi Adams

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780823234585

Published to Fordham Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.5422/fordham/9780823234585.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM FORDHAM SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Fordham University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in FSO for personal use (for details see www.fordham.universitypressscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 09 December 2018

Proto-Institutions and Epistemological Encounters

Proto-Institutions and Epistemological Encounters

Chapter:
(p.60) 2 Proto-Institutions and Epistemological Encounters
Source:
Castoriadis's Ontology
Author(s):

Suzi Adams

Publisher:
Fordham University Press
DOI:10.5422/fordham/9780823234585.003.0003

This chapter focuses on Castoriadis's epistemological grappling with the social-historical and argues that he does so via a critique of elementary reason (as a critique of Kant). He elucidates social-historical being as comprised of two strata: the ensemblistic-identitarian and the imaginary/signitive. He gives an account of the two proto-institutions of legein and teukhein. They can be understood as elementary forms of, respectively, “thinking” and “doing”, and act as a bridge between nature and the social-historical. Legein, as a form of “theoretical reason”, corresponds to proto-thinking, whilst teukhein, as a form of “practical reason”, converges with elementary social doing. Mathematics has a natural anchor in legein as the capacity to “distinguish-choose-posit-assemble-count-speak” in a universal manner, whilst teukhein involves identitarian aspects of “assembling-adjusting-fabricating-constructing”. Although there are overlaps between the two, each reveals a dimension that is absent in the other: The signitive relation is characteristic only of legein, whereas the transformative relation is present in teukhein. Castoriadis seeks to elucidate legein and teukhein as the social-historical, that is, institutional underpinning of ensemblistic-identiatarian logic and charts Castoriadis's growing realization that ontological foundations are inseparable from logical foundations.

Keywords:   legein, teukhein, reason, ensemblistic-identitarian logic, proto-institution, signitive relation, transformative relation, social doing

Fordham Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .